Sound Governance dan Gerakan Antikorupsi

  • Augustin Rina Herawati Universitas Diponegoro
  • Tri Yuniningsih Departemen Administrasi Publik, FISIP, Universitas Diponegoro
  • Endang Larasati Departemen Administrasi Publik, FISIP, Universitas Diponegoro
Abstract views: 26 , PDF downloads: 36
Keywords: Sound Governance, Anti-Corruption Movement, Governance

Abstract

The current rampant practice of corruption with various modus operandi has caused the Government to make efforts to prevent and eradicate it by issuing Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes through the concept of sound governance. The research method used in this study is a qualitative descriptive method. The type of data used in this study is qualitative data, which is categorized into two types, namely primary data and secondary data. Sources of data obtained through library research techniques which refers to sources available both online and offline. The results of the study concluded that sound governance as a preventive instrument against acts of corruption, the concept of sound governance can be used as an indicator of testing an action by government officials. Efforts to prevent acts of maladministration must be carried out using sound governance principles in an effort to eradicate corruption by government administration. The abuse of authority is an act of maladministration caused by actions that are not based on the principle of good administration in the form of the principle of prohibition of acting arbitrarily, the principle of justice, the principle of legal certainty, the principle of trust, the principle of equality, the principle of proportionality, the principle of prudence caution and considerations. Based on the eight principles of sound governance, the government apparatus will perform the duties and functions of government by always paying attention to these principles to become an effort to eradicate corrupt.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Addink, H. (2019). Good Governance Concept and Contex.

Anandya, D., Easter, L., Ramadhana, K., Husodo, A. T., Sunaryanto, A., & Watch, I. C. (2021). HASIL PEMANTAUAN TREN PENINDAKAN KASUS KORUPSI SEMESTER I 2021 Penulis : Diky Anandya Lalola Easter Kurnia Ramadhana Reviewer : Adnan Topan Husodo Agus Sunaryanto Indonesia Corruption Watch.

Anticorruption, O. (2021). Office of Anticorruption and Integrity 2021 Annual Report.

Asaduzzaman, M. (2017). Governance Theories and Models. October. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5

Farazmand, A. (2004). Sound Governance Policy and Administrative Innovations.

Ilmu, J., Holidin, D., & Handini, R. S. (2014). Sound Governance Analysis in the Innovation of Traditional Market Revitalization and Street Vendors Management. 21(1).

Ilmu, M., Negara, A., Makassar, U., Jurusan, D., Administrasi, I., Unismuh, N., Jurusan, D., Administrasi, I., & Unismuh, N. (2015). PENERAPAN DIMENSI SOUND GOVERNANCE DALAM. 1(April).

Suharsaputra, U. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Tindakan.

Tjahjanulin. (2011). Sound Governance. https://www.google.co.id/books/edition/Sound_Governance/gJGZDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=sound governance tjahjanulin&pg=PP1&printsec=frontcover

Yusuf, A. M. (n.d.). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Penelitian Gabungan.

Published
2022-11-01
How to Cite
Herawati, A. R., Yuniningsih, T., & Larasati, E. (2022). Sound Governance dan Gerakan Antikorupsi. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara ASIAN (Asosiasi Ilmuwan Administrasi Negara), 10(2), 452-458. https://doi.org/10.47828/jianaasian.v10i2.113