Apakah Partisipasi Masyarakat Dapat Mencegah Korupsi ?
Abstract views: 249
,
PDF downloads: 296
Abstract
The Indonesian government has developed policies aimed at encouraging village governments to learn to do business. Through the allocation of funds given to the village government, it is hoped that the village can develop a village-owned business. In its development, village governments in Indonesia have responded well to this policy, so that currently many villages have business units. However, as a public business, it is necessary to ask whether the village business has been carried out in an accountable manner. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the accountability system of village business management in Indonesia. This study uses a public governance approach, because village businesses use public funds, so public involvement is very important in its management. This research was conducted using quantitative methods, targeting BUMDes in Banyumas. The results of the study show how public participation can prevent corruption.
Downloads
References
Bac, M. (1998). The scope, timing, and type of corruption. International Review of Law and Economics, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8188(97)00060-4
Bovens, M., Goodin, R. E., Schillemans, T., & Mulgan, R. (2014). Accountability Deficits. In The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199641253.013.0010
Clithero-Eridon, A., Albright, D., & Ross, A. (2020). Conceptualising social accountability as an attribute of medical education. African Journal of Primary Health Care and Family Medicine, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v12i1.2213
Crack, A. M. (2013). INGO Accountability Deficits: The Imperatives for Further Reform. Globalizations, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2013.786253
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods. SAGE Publications, Inc.
Cunningham, J. V. (1972). Citizen Participation in Public Affairs. Public Administration Review, 32. https://doi.org/10.2307/975227
Donais, T., & Tanguay, E. (2021). Protection of Civilians and Peacekeeping’s Accountability Deficit. International Peacekeeping, 28(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/13533312.2021.1880900
Estrin, S., & Pelletier, A. (2018). Privatization in developing countries: What are the lessons of recent experience? World Bank Research Observer, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkx007
Fontaine, G., Narváez, I., & Paz, B. (2018). Explaining public accountability deficit in extractive policies: The Ecuadorian case. Extractive Industries and Society, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2017.11.005
Gromov, V. G. (2019). Corruption in Russia: concept, types, determinants. Forensic Research & Criminology International Journal, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.15406/frcij.2019.07.00282
Han, Y. (2020). The impact of accountability deficit on agency performance: performance-accountability regime. Public Management Review, 22(6). https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1679237
Han, Y., & Tang, S. Y. (2021). How quality reporting reduces accountability deficit and overload. Public Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1963823
Heo, I. (2018). The paradox of administrative decentralization reform in young Asian democracies: South Korea and Indonesia. World Affairs, 181(4), 372–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0043820018813474
Hill, P., & Hupe, A. (2013). Implementation Public Policy. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699.
Jones, D. S. (2015). Infrastructure management in Singapore: privatization and government control. Asian Education and Development Studies, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-12-2014-0064
Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. (2015). Governance networks in the public sector. In Governance Networks in the Public Sector. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315887098
Klitgaard, R. (2020). Controlling Corruption. In Controlling Corruption. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520911185
Knaggård, Å. (2015). The Multiple Streams Framework and the problem broker. European Journal of Political Research, 54(3), 450–465. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12097
Kurniasih, D., Setyoko, P. I., & Imron, M. (2017). Problems of Public Accountability in Village Government Business Management (Study on Village Business Enterprises in Banyumas, Indonesia). Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 7(4), 147. https://doi.org/10.5296/jpag.v7i4.11850
Lewis, J. S. (2021). Corruption Perceptions and Contentious Politics in Africa: How Different Types of Corruption Have Shaped Africa’s Third Wave of Protest. Political Studies Review, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929920903657
Li, Y., Qin, X., & Koppenjan, J. (2022). Accountability through public participation? Experiences from the ten-thousand-citizen review in Nanjing, China. Journal of Public Policy, 42(1). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X21000027
Mosley, J. E. (2011). Institutionalization, privatization, and political opportunity: What tactical choices reveal about the policy advocacy of human service nonprofits. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(3), 435–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764009346335
O’Doherty, K. C. (2017). Deliberative public opinion. History of the Human Sciences, 30(4), 124–145.
O’doherty, K., Gauvin, F.-P., Grogan, C., & Friedman, W. (2012). Implementing a Public Deliberative Forum. Hastings Center Report, 42(2), 20–23.
Sabatier, V., Medah, I., Augsdorfer, P., & Maduekwe, A. (2017). Social business model design and implementation in developing countries: Learning from an affordable medicine developed in Burkina Faso. Journal of Management Development, 36(1), 48–57. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-03-2015-0041
Sartor, M. A., & Beamish, P. W. (2020). Private Sector Corruption, Public Sector Corruption and the Organizational Structure of Foreign Subsidiaries. Journal of Business Ethics, 167(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04148-1
Seno, R. H. (2020). Reformasi Administrasi di Korea Selatan: Sebuah Pembelajaran Kesuksesan. Jurnal Wacana Kinerja: Kajian Praktis-Akademis Kinerja Dan Administrasi Pelayanan Publik, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.31845/jwk.v23i2.667
Uberti, L. J. (2022). Corruption and growth: Historical evidence, 1790–2010. Journal of Comparative Economics, 50(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2021.10.002
van Osch, D., de Ruiter, R., & Yesilkagit, K. (2021). An accountability deficit? Holding transgovernmental networks to account. Journal of European Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1998193
Vickers, J., & Yarrow, G. (2012). Economic Perspectives on Privatization. Journal of Economic Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.5.2.111
Yunus, M., Moingeon, B., & Lehmann-Ortega, L. (2010). Building social business models: Lessons from the grameen experience. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 308–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.12.005
Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara ASIAN (Asosiasi Ilmuwan Administrasi Negara)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s).
2. The author grants the journal, right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
5. The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
