Kolaborasi Pentahelix dalam Penanganan Sampah: Studi Kasus Peran Pemerintah, Akademisi, Bisnis, Komunitas, dan Media di Kota Kupang

  • Yohanes Fry Loli Keluli Universitas Nusa Cendana
  • William Djani Universitas Nusa Cendana
  • I Putu Yoga Bumi Pradana Universitas Nusa Cendana
Abstract views: 3 , PDF downloads: 2
Keywords: Collaboration, Pentahelix, Waste, Behavior, Policy

Abstract

This study aims to analyze pentahelix collaboration in waste management in Kupang City, East Nusa Tenggara Province. Waste, particularly household waste, has become a serious problem in almost all major cities in Indonesia, including Kupang. The research employs a qualitative approach using in-depth interviews, participatory observation, and document analysis. The findings reveal significant limitations in human resources, transportation facilities, containers, and budget allocation for waste management. Collaboration among stakeholders remains minimal, with the waste management roadmap yet to be widely socialized. Existing legal instruments are limited to MoUs, cooperation agreements, and temporary decrees. Moreover, public awareness of sorting and disposing of waste properly remains low. The novelty of this study lies in highlighting that waste management cannot be addressed solely by the government but requires pentahelix collaboration involving local government, communities, the private sector, media, and academia. The impact of this research is twofold: it exposes systemic weaknesses in waste governance in peripheral regions while underscoring the importance of cross-actor collaboration. The practical recommendations offered include establishing permanent regulations, strengthening infrastructure, ensuring sustainable budget allocation, and promoting environmental literacy, starting from families to educational institutions. Thus, this study not only identifies problems but also provides concrete policy directions for strengthening sustainable waste governance in Kupang City.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Addahlawi, N., Karim, M. S., & Fauzi, A. (2019). Urbanization and municipal solid waste management: Challenges and prospects in Indonesia. Journal of Environmental Management and Sustainability, 8(2), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemsu.2019.04.005

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032

Bungin, B. (2021). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif: Aktualisasi metodologis ke arah ragam kontemporer. Rajawali Pers.

Bulkeley, H., Carmin, J., Castán Broto, V., Edwards, G. A. S., & Fuller, S. (2016). Urban climate politics: Agency and authority in governing cities. Cambridge University Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2015). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W. (2019). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Cristofoli, D., Meneguzzo, M., & Riccucci, N. M. (2017). Collaborative administration: The management of public networks. Public Management Review, 19(3), 275–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1195433

Djani, V., Prakoso, B., & Santosa, M. A. (2019). Policy networks and collaborative governance in Indonesia’s environmental management. Policy & Governance Review, 3(2), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.30589/pgr.v3i2.163

Dinas Kebersihan Kota Kupang. (2024). Laporan tahunan pengelolaan persampahan Kota Kupang 2019–2023. Pemerintah Kota Kupang.

Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (2015). Collaborative governance regimes. Georgetown University Press.

Faisal, S. (1990). Penelitian kualitatif: Dasar-dasar dan aplikasi. Yayasan Asih Asah Asuh.

Fusch, P. I., Fusch, G. E., & Ness, L. R. (2018). Denzin’s paradigm shift: Revisiting triangulation in qualitative research. Journal of Social Change, 10(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.5590/JOSC.2018.10.1.02

Fusch, P. I., & Ness, L. R. (2015). Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 20(9), 1408–1416. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2015.2281

Hardipurnomo, A. (2022). Urban waste crisis in Kupang: Challenges for local governance. Indonesian Journal of Environmental Policy, 5(2), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.7454/ijep.v5i2.103

Hidayat, A., Firmansyah, I., & Nurlaili, N. (2020). Waste management governance in Bandung City: Lessons for collaborative governance. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi dan Organisasi, 27(2), 153–165. https://doi.org/10.20476/jbb.v27i2.11875

Hussein, A. (2021). The use of purposive sampling in qualitative research. Asian Journal of Qualitative Research, 4(2), 128–135. https://doi.org/10.5430/ajqr.v4n2p128

Koontz, T. M., & Thomas, C. W. (2018). Use of science in collaborative environmental management: Evidence from local watershed partnerships in the United States. Science and Public Policy, 45(2), 221–231. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scx067

Marlina, E. (2020). Domestic waste and urban environmental challenges in Indonesia. Journal of Environmental Science and Sustainable Development, 3(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.7454/jessd.v3i1.1021

McDermott, C. L., Cashore, B., & Kanowski, P. (2019). Global environmental governance and the forest sector: Institutional design and evaluation. Routledge.

Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2021). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 38(2), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101110

Moleong, L. J. (2012). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Morse, R. S., & Stephens, J. B. (2012). Teaching collaborative governance: Phases, competencies, and case-based learning. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 18(3), 565–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2012.12001694

Muhyi, H. A., Chan, A., & Ali, A. (2017). The pentahelix collaboration model in developing centers of entrepreneurship in Indonesia. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 9(1), 34–37. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJET.2017.V9.952

Pradana, I. P. Y. B. (2024). Pembangunan multidimensional. Penamuda Indonesia, Yogyakarta.

Purdy, J. M. (2012). Framework for assessing power in collaborative governance processes. Public Administration Review, 72(3), 409–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02525.x

Sovacool, B. K., Hook, A., Martiskainen, M., & Baker, L. (2020). The whole systems energy injustice of four European low-carbon transitions. Global Environmental Change, 67, 102218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102218

Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2021). Interactive political leadership: The role of politicians in the age of governance. Oxford University Press.

Thomsen, M. K., Jakobsen, M., & Jensen, R. (2021). Can collaborative governance increase trust? Examining the causal mechanism. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 31(3), 599–615. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaa039

Wibowo, S. A., Fitriani, R., & Pramono, H. (2021). The role of community participation through waste banks in improving environmental governance in Surabaya. Journal of Environmental Management, 293, 112815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112815

Published
2025-08-28
How to Cite
Fry Loli Keluli, Y., Djani, W., & Putu Yoga Bumi Pradana, I. (2025). Kolaborasi Pentahelix dalam Penanganan Sampah: Studi Kasus Peran Pemerintah, Akademisi, Bisnis, Komunitas, dan Media di Kota Kupang. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara AsIAN (Asosiasi Ilmuwan Administrasi Negara), 13(1), 29-49. https://doi.org/10.47828/jianaasian.v13i1.306