Kebijakan Desentralisasi dan Disparitas Pendidikan Lokal di Provinsi Sulawesi Tenggara
Abstract views: 532
,
PDF downloads: 777
Abstract
Paradoxically, decentralization policies can increase the participation and effectiveness of education services, but in the context of public policies, it can also lead to educational disparities in society. This research was conducted to explain educational disparities in the perspective of decentralization policies as part of a public problem. This research method uses an interactive qualitative approach with data collection techniques through observation, a document study, and in-depth interviews and is analyzed using Spradley data analysis. The results showed that education policies in the regions did not create a balance, but instead opened up space for educational disparities in society, through the spatial and structural approach policy patterns. The dynamics of the education policy process are reflected in the contestation of the structural and political elites which tend to interfere with the efficiency, effectiveness, and professionalism of education management. Local governments are often trapped in political interests and always place "elite capture" in decision-making. Thus limiting the space for community participation and opening up spaces for educational disparities between central and periphery areas
Downloads
References
Bardhan, P. & Mokherjee, D. 2005. Capture and Governance at Local and National Levels, American Economic Review, Vol. 90, No. 2, pp. 135-139.
Bell, Les & Howard, Stevenson. 2006. Education Policy, Prosses, Themes and Impact, by Routledge, New York.
Bremen, Jan. 1997. Menjinakkan Sang Kuli, Politik Kolonial pada Awal Abad Ke-20, Jakarta: Pustaka Utama Grafiti.
Budge, I. & H. Keman. 1990. Parties and Democracy: Coalition Formation and Government Functioning in Twenty State, London: Oxford University Press.
Cheema, G. Shabbir & Dennis A. Rondinelli. 1988. Decentralization and Development: Policy Implementation in Developing Countries, Beverly Hills, California: Sage.
Dorius, Shawn F. 2013. The Rise and Fall of Worldwide Education Inequality from 1870 to 2010: Measurement and Trends, Sociology of Education, Vol. 86, No. 2 (April, 2013), pp. 158-173. Diakses melalui http://www.jstor.org/stable/43186768.
Dunn, William N. 1994. Public Policy Analysis an Introduction, Prentice Hall Inc. A Simon and Schuste Company Englewood Clift, New Jersey.
Dye, Thomas R. 2000. Understanding Public Policy, Perentice Hall, New York.
Dwiningrum, Irene Astuti. 2011. Desentralisasi dan Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Pendidikan, Yogyakarta, Pustaka Pelajar.
Dwiyanto, Agus. 2005. Mewujudkan Good Governance: Melalui Pelayanan Publik, Yogyakarta, Gajah Mada University Prees.
Effendy, Muhadjir. 2016. Kesenjangan Pendidikan, diakses (1 Agustus 2016) http://pojoksatu.id/pendidikan/2016/08/01/ini-3-kesenjangan-pendidikan-menurut-mendikbud-muhadjir.
Fischer, Frank, Gerald J. Miller & Mara S. Sidney. 2015. Handbook Analisis Kebijakan Publik. Teori, Politik dan Metode. Bandung, Penerbit: Nusa Media.
Grindle, MS. 2007. Going local: Decentralization, Democratization, And The Promise of Good Governance. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Gunawan, Imam. 2010. Arah Politik Pendidikan Indonesia, diakses (April 2017) http://masimamgun.blogspot.co.id/2010/05/arah-politik-pendidikan-indonesia.html.
Howlett, Michael & Ramesh, M. 1995. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystem, Canada: Oxford University Press.
Keban, Yeremias T. 2016. Enam Dimensi Strategis Administrasi Publik, Konsep, Teori dan Isu, Yogyakarta: Gava Media.
Lewis, Oscar. (1983). “Kebudayaan Kemiskinan”; Dalam Kemiskinan di Perkotaan, Jakarta: Sinar Harapan.
Lewis, Theodore. 2007. Social Inequality in Education: A Constraint on an American High-Skills Future, Vol. 37, No. 4 (Dec., 2007), pp. 329-349. Diakses melalui http://www.jstor.org/stable/30053159.
Malley, M. S. 2003. New Rules, Old Structures and the Limits of Democratic Decentralisation, in Local Power and Politics in Indonesia: Decentralisation and Democratisation, eds E. Aspinall & G. Fealy, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore, pp. 102-116.
Montt, Guillermo. 2011. Cross-national Differences in Educational Achievement Inequality, American Sociological Association, Vol. 84, No. 1 (January, 2011), pp. 49-68. Diakses melalui http://www.jstor.org/stable/23057035.
Morgan, Michael., Rein, Marti & Goodin, Robert E. 2015. Handbook Kebijakan Publik. Bandung: Penerbit, Nusa Media.
Nguyen, Mai. 2011. Closing the Education Gap: A Case for Aboriginal Early Childhood Education in Canada, ALook at the Aboriginal Headstart Program. Canadian Journal of Education/Revue canadienne de l'éducation, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 229-248.
Nurzaman, S.S. 2002. Perencanaan Wilayah di Indonesai Pada Masa Sekitar Krisis, Bandung: ITB.
Paqueo V. & Lammert. J. 2000. Decentarlization in Education. New York: Education Reform dan Management Thematic Group.
Parsons, Wayne. 2014. Public Policy: Pengantar Teori dan Praktik Analisis Kebijakan, Jakarta: Kencana.
Putra, Andika K. 2015. Resistensi Finlandia Terhadap Global Education Reform Movement, Journal Analisis Hubungan Internasional, Universitas Airlangga, Vol. 4. No. 1, hlm. 1393-1418.
Rohman, A. (2010). Education Policy In Decentralization Era, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Surakhmad, Winarno 2009. Pendidikan Nasional, Strategi dan Tragedi, Jakarta: PT. Kompas, Media Nusantara.
Wahab, Abdul Solihin. 1991. Pengantar Analisis Kebijakan Negara, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Wibowo, Udik Budi. 2015. Carut Marut Kebijakan Pendidikan di Indonesia, Proceeding National Seminar and International Confrence, Scientific Forum-Faculty of Education & Departement of Educational Science (FIP-JIP), pp. 502-509.
Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara ASIAN (Asosiasi Ilmuwan Administrasi Negara)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s).
2. The author grants the journal, right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
5. The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
