Stakeholders Mapping Tata Kelola Kerukunan Umat Beragama di Indonesia

(Studi Kasus di Kota Cilegon Provinsi Banten)

  • kandung sapto nugroho Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
Abstract views: 139 , PDF downloads: 150
Keywords: Stakeholder Mapping, Cilegon City, Religious Harmony


Conflicts in the name of religion in various parts of the world are currently escalating, and Indonesia is no exception. Cilegon City is known as one of the intolerant cities. This article was conducted to identify stakeholders in the governance of religious harmony in Cilegon City, then categorize them and look at interactions between stakeholders. The study was conducted with a qualitative approach. Data collection by interviews, observation and documentation studies while still carrying out the obligation to triangulate data sources and techniques. This study found that there are six stakeholders namely: government, social organizations, mass media, academics, private sector, and quasi-NGOs with six different roles, namely as (1) regulator; (2) facilitators; (3) implementers; (4) evaluators; (5) advocates; and (6) beneficiaries and have four different interests, namely (1) economy; (2) social; (3) politics; and (4) religion. The researcher encourages further studies on the potential and consensus strategies for local wisdom in fulfilling the right to houses of worship in Banten.


Download data is not yet available.


Azhari, S., & Halili. (2020). Indeks Kota Toleran 2020. In I. Yosarie (Ed.), Setara-Institute.Org. Pustaka Masyarakat Setara.
Binz, C., & Truffer, B. (2017). Global Innovation System-A Conceptual Framework for Innovations Dyanmics in Transnational Contexts. Research Policy, 46(7), 1284–1298.
Breesam, H. K., & Kadhim Jawad, Z. A. (2021). Application of stakeholder theory in procedures for maintenance work for government buildings in Iraq. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1090(1), 1.
Brunetta, F., Marchegiani, L., & Peruffo, E. (2016). When Birds of a feather dont flock together: Diversity and Innovation outcomes in International R&D Collaborations. Journal of Business Research, 114, 436–445.
Calzada, I. (2016). Plugging smart cities with urban transformations: Towards multi-stakeholder city-regional complex urbanity. Journal of Urban Studies and Social Sciences, 6(2), 37.
Carayannis E. G., Barth, T. D., & F., C. D. (2012). The Quintuple Helix innovation model: Global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 1–12.
Carroll, A. B., & Nasi, J. (1977). Understanding Stakeholder Thinking: Themes from a Finnish Conference. Business Ethics, 6(1), 46–51.
Crosby, B. (1991). Stakeholder Analysis : A Vital Tool for Strategic Managers. In U.S Agency for International Development (Issue 2).
Dunn, W. N. (2003). Pengantar Analisis Kebijakan Publik (Kedua). Gadjah Mada University Press.
Economist Intelligence Unit. (2021). Democracy Index 2021: The China Challenge. In National Interest.
Eden, C., & Ackermann, F. (1998). Making Strategy: The Journey of Strategic Management. SAGE Publications.
Etzkowitz, H. L. L. (2000). The Dynamic of Innovation: from National System and “mode 2” to a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Res Policy, 29.
Friedman, A. L., & Miles, S. (2006). Stakeholders Theory and Practice. In Oxford University Press (p. 1).
Halili, P., Hasani, E. I., Ahli, P., & Tigor, B. (2018). Indeks Kota Toleran (IKT) Tahun 2018. Pustaka Masyarakat Setara.
Hasche, N., Hoglund, L., & Linton, G. (2019). Quadruple helix as a network of relationships: Creating value within a Swedish regional innovation system. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship.
Haynes, J, Macmillan, P., & Limited, M. P. (2005). Religion and Development (Jeffrey Haynes (ed.)). Palgrave Advances in Development Studies, Macmillan Publishers Limited.
Katadata. (2021). Sebanyak 88,86% Penduduk Indonesia Beragama Islam.
Kemenag RI. (2017). Tri Kerukunan Umat Beragama.
Kemenag RI. (2019). Kerukunan Umat Beragama Tahun 2019.
Kirmani, N. (2008). Review Reviewed Work ( s ): Religion and Development : Conflict or Cooperation ? by Jeffrey Haynes : Development and Faith : Where Mind and Soul Work Together by Katherine Marshall and Marisa Van Saanen. 18(6), 808–810.
Lazzeretti, L., & Capone, F. (2016). How Proximity Matters in Innovation Networks Dynamic Along the CLuster Evolution. A Study of the high technology applied to Cultural Goods. Journal of Business Research, 69(12), 5855–5865.
Lienert, J., Schnetzer, F., & Ingold, K. (2013). Stakeholder analysis combined with social network analysis provides fine-grained insights into water infrastructure planning processes. Journal of Environmental Management, 125, 134–148.
Lindmark, A., Sturesson, E., & Nilsson-Roos, M. (2009). Difficulties of collaboration for innovation - A study in the Öresund region. 1–236.
Malik, A., Sharma, P., Pereira, V., & Temouri, Y. (2021). From regional innovation systems to global innovation hubs: Evidence of a Quadruple Helix from an emerging economy. Journal of Business Research, 128(December 2020), 587–598.
Maynard-moody, S., & Musheno, M. (2012). Social Equities and Inequities in Practice: Street-Level Workers as Agents and Pragmatists. Public Administration Review, December.
Nifasri. (2021). Persiapan Tahun Toleransi 2022. Pusat Kerukunan Umat Beragama.
Peris-ortiz, M. (2016). Multiple Helix Ecosystems for Sustainable Competitiveness - Google Livros. Springer.
Pischetola, M. (2016). Social Media in Education, Main Sources for Inclusion and Collaborative Learning. In B. Coban (Ed.), Social Media and Social Movements, The Transformation of Communication Patterns (pp. 209–228). Lexington Books.
Putra, I. N. D. (2018). Peran Stakeholder dalam Pelestarian dan Pengembangan Wisata Budaya di Bali.
Rachim, A., Warella, Y., Astuti, R. S., & Suharyanto, S. (2020). Hexa Helix: Stakeholder Model in the Management of Floodplain of Lake Tempe. Prizren Social Science Journal, 4(1), 20–27.
Reed, M. S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Hubacek, K., Morris, J., Prell, C., Quinn, C. H., & Stringer, L. C. (2009). Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1933–1949.
Rowlinson, S., & Cheung, Y. K. F. (2008). Stakholder Mnagement Through Empowerment: Modelling Project Success. Construction Management and Economics, 611–623.
Schutz, F., Heidingsfelder, M. L., & Schraudner, M. (2019). Co-shaping the future in Quadruple Helix innovation systems: Uncovering public preferences toward participatory research and innovations. She Ji: Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 5(2), 128–146.
Suprayogo, I., & Tobroni. (2001). Metodologi Penelitian Sosial-Agama. Remaja Rosdakarya Bandung.
Waardenburg, J. (1972). Religion between Reality and Idea: A Century of Phenomenology of Religion in the Netherlands. Numen, 19(2/3), 132.
Zakaria, Z., Sophian, R. I., Muljana, B., Gusriani, N., & Zakaria, S. (2019). The Hexa-Helix Concept for Supporting Sustainable Regional Development (Case Study: Citatah Area, Padalarang Subdistrict, West Java, Indonesia). IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 396(1).
How to Cite
sapto nugroho, kandung. (2023). Stakeholders Mapping Tata Kelola Kerukunan Umat Beragama di Indonesia: (Studi Kasus di Kota Cilegon Provinsi Banten). Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara ASIAN (Asosiasi Ilmuwan Administrasi Negara), 11(2), 56-67.