Indonesia’s National Resilience through Adaptive Defense Governance in the Era of Hybrid Warfare

  • Delfiazi Puji Lestari STIA Annisa Dwi Salfarizi Palembang
  • Tsulis Amiruddin Zahri Fakultas Pendidikan Pancasila, Universitas Bangka Belitung, Indonesia
Abstract views: 76 , PDF downloads: 69
Keywords: Adaptive Defense Governance, National Resilience, Hybrid Warfare, Collaborative Governance, Defense Transformation

Abstract

The evolution of hybrid warfare has fundamentally reshaped national security threats from conventional military confrontation into multidimensional challenges involving cyberattacks, disinformation, economic coercion, and ideological influence. While previous studies have primarily examined defense modernization, military strategy, or cybersecurity separately, limited attention has been paid to how defense institutional transformation can strengthen national resilience through a public administration and governance perspective. This study aims to analyze the transformation of Indonesia’s defense institutions in responding to hybrid warfare and to develop an adaptive defense governance model that integrates defense, governance, and national resilience. Employing a qualitative descriptive-analytical design, the study analyzes government regulations, strategic policy documents, institutional reports, and peer-reviewed literature using thematic analysis to identify patterns of institutional adaptation and governance transformation. The findings reveal four strategic dimensions of adaptive defense governance: (1) institutional adaptation through the establishment of the National Defense Council, (2) strengthened inter-agency coordination based on a whole-of-government approach, (3) integration of cyber defense and digital resilience into the national defense system, and (4) collaborative civil–military governance to enhance multidomain resilience. Nevertheless, institutional fragmentation, overlapping authority, limited policy interoperability, and weak strategic coordination remain significant barriers to effective implementation. This study contributes by proposing an adaptive defense governance framework that extends existing defense governance literature through the integration of national resilience, collaborative governance, and hybrid warfare perspectives. Practically, the proposed framework provides policy guidance for strengthening institutional coordination and developing a more integrated, adaptive, and resilient national defense system in addressing future hybrid threats.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2021). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.

Buzan, B., & Wæver, O. (2022). Regions and powers: The structure of international security. Cambridge University Press.

Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2020). The whole-of-government approach to public sector reform. Public Administration Review, 67(6), 1059–1066.

CoE, H. (2023). Hybrid threats: A comprehensive resilience ecosystem. European Centre of Excellence for Countering Hybrid Threats. https://www.hybridcoe.fi/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/CORE_comprehensive_resilience_ecosystem.pdf

Danylenko, S. (2025). Cross-sectoral resilience: Lessons from Ukrainian local governance under hybrid threats. Discover Social Science and Health.

Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2022). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30(1), 441–473.

Gustafsson, M., Wihlborg, E., Borodin, Y., & Kvitka, S. (2025). Adaptive governance amidst the war: Overcoming institutional challenges through collaborative digital service delivery in Ukraine. Government Information Quarterly, 42(3), 102056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2025.102056

Hoffman, F. G. (2007). Conflict in the 21st century: The rise of hybrid wars. Potomac Institute for Policy Studies.

Indonesia, M. of D. of the R. of. (2025). Indonesia defense policy and strategic transformation report 2025. Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Indonesia.

Kunce, B. (2025). Strengthening societal resilience against hybrid warfare. Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies.

Mietzner, M. (2025). Civil–military relations and democratic resilience in Indonesia’s contemporary governance. Asian Survey, 65(1), 33–57.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, M. A., & Saldana, J. (2020). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (4th ed.) (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

NATO. (2024). NATO hybrid threats and resilience framework report 2024. North Atlantic Treaty Organization.

Nye, J. S. (2021). The future of power. Public Affairs.

Pierre, J., & Peters, B. G. (2020). Governance, Politics and the State (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.

Pramono, B. (2025). Strategic adaptations for hybrid warfare: Enhancing Indonesian national defence in the digital era. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 8(6), 974–981. https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v8i6.9776

Pramudya, R., Hidayat, T., & Kurniawan, A. (2026). National resilience and multidomain defense challenges in Southeast Asia. Journal of Defense and Security Studies, 12(1), 22–39.

RI, S. (2025). Pembentukan Dewan Pertahanan Nasional sebagai strategi penguatan pertahanan negara. Sekretariat Kabinet Republik Indonesia.

Sukma, R. (2023). Indonesia and Indo-Pacific strategic competition: National resilience and regional security challenges. Pacific Review, 36(4), 611–629.

Union, I. T. (2024). Global cybersecurity report 2024. ITU Publications.

Published
2026-07-17
How to Cite
Lestari, D. P., & Zahri , T. A. (2026). Indonesia’s National Resilience through Adaptive Defense Governance in the Era of Hybrid Warfare. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara AsIAN (Asosiasi Ilmuwan Administrasi Negara), 14(1), 335-348. https://doi.org/10.47828/jianaasian.v14i1.430